Urgensi Pengaturan Mekanisme Ganti Rugi Dalam Ajudikasi Khusus Ombudsman
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Law Number 25 of 2009 on Public Services grants the Ombudsman authority to resolve public service disputes through mediation, conciliation, and special adjudication, including compensation for maladministration. However, its implementation remains suboptimal due to the absence of technical regulations on procedures, compensation standards, and enforcement, resulting in a legal gap and weakening the binding force of Ombudsman decisions. This study employs a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that without implementing regulations, compensation mechanisms are ineffective. Therefore, further regulation is needed to ensure legal certainty, justice, and the protection of public rights in public service delivery.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Absori. (2013). Politik Hukum Menuju Hukum Progresif. Suarakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.
Aqil, A. (2022). Kewenangan Ombudsman dalam Perkara Tuntutan Ganti Kerugian Pelayanan Publik. Ombudsman RI. Retrieved from https://ombudsman.go.id/perwakilan/news/r/pwkinternal--eksekusi-putusan-ajudikasi-khusus-dalam-tuntutan-ganti-kerugian-pelayanan-publik
Astuti, M. F., & Koynaja, J. J. (2025). Kewenangan Ajudikasi Khusus Ombudsman Republik Indonesia dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Diskresi, 4(1), 2025.
Hadi., S. (2022). Ganti Rugi dalam Pelayanan Publik. Retrieved from https://ombudsman.go.id/artikel/r/pwkinternal--ganti-rugi-dalam-pelayanan-publik
Hasjimzoem, Y. (2014). Eksistensi Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no2.303
Internasional Ombudsman Institute. (n.d.). The Concept Of The Ombudsman And How The Ombudsman Can Be Used As A Tool To Strengthen Government Institutions To Be An Efficient Service That Is Responsible And Responsive To The Needs Of The Citizens. Retrieved from https://www.theioi.org/the-i-o-i
Kadarsih, S. (2010). Tugas dan wewenang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia dalam pelayanan publik menurut UU No. 37 Tahun 2008. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 10(2), 180.
Kiswara, D. R. (2025). Restorative Justice dan Metode Propartif sebagai Pendekatan Penegakan Keadilan Substantif. Ombudsman RI. Retrieved from https://ombudsman.go.id/artikel/r/pwkinternal--restorative-justice-dan-metode-propartif-sebagai-pendekatan-penegakan-keadilan-substantif?utm_source
Marzuki, P. M. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press.
Mastur, & Salsabela, Y. (2025). Mekanisme Pembayaran Ganti Kerugian Dalam Ajudikasi Khusus Oleh Ombudsman Berdasarkan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 31 Tahun 2018 Tentang Mekanisme Dan Tata Cara Ajudikasi Khusus Dalam Upaya Penegakan Prinsip Good Governance. Jurnal Qistie, 32(3), 167–186.
Meitasaria, Intan, Shinta Hadiyantina, Indah Dwi Qurbanic, "Urgensi Аjudikаsi Khusus Ombudsmаn Republik Indonesiа Dаlаm Penyelesаiаn Sengketа Pelаyаnаn Publik." Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 5.1 (2020): 105.
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. NTB: Mataram University Press.
Prof. Muhammad Siddiq Armia, M.H., Ph. d. (2022). Penentuan Metode Dan Pendekatan Penelitian Hukum. Aceh: lembaga Kajian Konstitusi Indonesia (LKKI).
Ratminto, & Winarsih, A. (2006). Manajemen Pelayanan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Widiarty, W. S. (2024). Buku Ajar Penelitian Hukum.
Yuswarni. (2024). Ombudsman dalam Peningkatan Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara ASIAN (Asosiasi Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara), 161.
Zsa Zsa Bangun Pratama. (2021). Kewenangan Ajudikasi Oleh Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Pelayanan Publik. Journal Equitable, 5(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.37859/jeq.v5i1.2467