Model Pemilu Serentak Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The implementation of the simultaneous "five boxes" election model in 2019 and 2024 has caused various complex problems for organizers, election participants, and voters, both at the central and regional levels. Therefore, the Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 mandates the separation of national and regional elections. This research aims to analyze the considerations of the Constitutional Court's decision and the shift in the paradigm of simultaneity, analyze the separation of national and regional elections from a utilitarian perspective, and formulate an election model after the Constitutional Court's decision. The research method applied is normative juridical (doctrinal). This research uses a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. Research data were collected thru literature study. Data sources include primary, secondary, and tertiary data. Next, the data is analyzed qualitatively. Broadly speaking, there are four dimensions that form the basis of the Court's consideration in the decision, namely the philosophical, sociological, juridical, and technical dimensions. From a utilitarian perspective, the separation of national and regional elections is beneficial for improving the quality of democracy, optimizing the performance of election organizers and public participation, strengthening internal party strategies, and enhancing government accountability. The simultaneous election model after the Constitutional Court's decision is a national election held simultaneously in 2029 and interim elections with an interval of two to two and a half years.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Afandi, M., Amboro, F. Y. P., & Seroja, T. D. (2025). Reconstruction of the Election Simultaneity Model through the Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024: Constitutional or Unconstitutional? Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2446
Aisyah, S., & Wulandari, D. F. (2025). Analisis Prinsip Utilitarianisme dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Yudisial: Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 135/PUU- XXII/2024 tentang Pemisahan Pemilu Nasional dan Daerah. 6(4), 877–891. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i04.1780
Almunawar, A. (2025). Implikasi Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024 tentang Pemisahan Pemilu Nasional dan Lokal. Jurnal Hukum Berkeadaban, 1(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.71094/jhb.v1i1.48
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara Jilid II. Sekjen dan Kepaniteraan MK.
Birch, S. (2011). Electoral Malpractice. OUP Oxford.
Budiardjo, M. (2003). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Chawarazmi, Z. (2025). KPU Soal Putusan MK: Masa Jabatan Anggota DPRD Potensi Diperpanjang. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/kpu-soal-putusan-mk-masa-jabatan-anggota-dprd-potensi-diperpanjang-25Ly1oewfEl/full
Dahl, R. A. (2020). On Democracy. Yale University Press.
Fatullah, A. A., Agung, M. M., & Meladiah, R. (2025). Implikasi Konstitusional dan Sistemik: Analisis Putusan MK Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024 tentang Pemisahan Pemilu Nasional dan Pilkada. El Qonun: Jurnal Hukum Ketatanegaraan, 3(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19109/elqonun.v3i1.30988
Geys, B. (2006). Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate-Level Research. Electoral Studies, 25, 637–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2005.09.002
Ginsburg, T. (2003). Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge University Press.
Golder, M. (2003). Explaining Variation In The Success Of Extreme Right Parties In Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies - COMP POLIT STUD, 36, 432–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414003251176
Hakim, H. A., Zykro, M. R., & Rezanda, R. L. (2025). Dinamika dalam Pemilihan Umum dan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Perkara Nomor. 135/PUU -XXII-2024). RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(4), 6857–6866. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.4647
Haryadi. (2025). Putusan MK No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024: Kontroversi dan Desain Rekayasa Politik. Lab45. https://www.lab45.id/detail/342/putusan-mk-no-135-puu-xxii-2024-kontroversi-dan-desain-rekayasa-politik
Huntington, S. P. (1993). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Oklahoma Press.
Huroiroh, E., Tutik, T. T., & Prasetyo, D. I. (2025). Implications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU- XXII/2024 on the Separation of DPR and DPRD Elections on the Electoral System in Indonesia. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 9(135), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.36501/justitia.v1i2.
Isnaeni, M. (2025). Reconstruction of the Election System Following Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024: A Legal-Normative Review of the Separation of National and Regional Elections. Jihad: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi, 7(3). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v7i3.9264
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. Yale University Press.
Mashabi, S., & Erdianto, K. (2020). Refleksi Pemilu 2019, Sebanyak 894 Petugas KPPS Meninggal Dunia. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/01/22/15460191/refleksi-pemilu-2019-sebanyak-894-petugas-kpps-meninggal-dunia
Mill, J. S. (1998). Utilitarianism. Oxford University Press.
Mufti, M., & Naafisah, D. D. (2013). Teori-Teori Demokrasi. CV. Pustaka Setia.
Norris, P. (2004). Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge University Press.
Parapat, A. R. & Khalid. (2025). Analisisw Putusan Mahakamah Konstitusi Nomor 135 PUU-XXII/2024 Tentang Pemisahan Pemilu Nasional dan Pemilu Daerah Perspektif Siyasah Dusturiyah. Qanun: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies, 4(1), 527–537. https://doi.org/10.58738/qanun.v4i1.931
Poerwoto, Y. L. (2025). Daftar Partai Dukung Kepala Daerah Tak Lagi Dipilih Rakyat Tapi DPRD, Terbaru Gerindra. https://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/7772471/daftar-partai-dukung-kepala-daerah-tak-lagi-dipilih-rakyat-tapi-dprd-terbaru-gerindra
Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. C., & Manin, B. (1999). Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge University Press.
Ramadhan, A. B. (2025). Lukman Hakim Usul “Pemilu Sela” Agar Putusan MK Tak Langgar UUD. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-8013523/lukman-hakim-usul-pemilu-sela-agar-putusan-mk-tak-langgar-uud
Reynolds, A., Reilly, B., & Ellis, A. (2005). Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Electoral-System-Design%3A-The-New-International-IDEA-Reynolds-Reilly/0ed80a00b3b39229d3d64fe387ebc26b82c340f8
Sani, A., Darmawan, D., Noor, F., & Romli, L. (2025). Reconfiguring Electoral Design Post-Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024: Prospects for Meaningful Voter Participation. Jurnal Konstitusi, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk22410
Santosa, T., & Budhiati, I. (2018). Pemilu di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Shugart, M. S., & Carey, J. M. (1992). Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Sirajuddin, S., Ramadhan, F., & Rafiqi, I. D. (2021). Urgensi Pemisahan Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Umum Serentak Nasional dan Lokal. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi, 4(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5224