Implementasi Ultra Vires, Ex Officio, Ex Aequo Et Bono Pada Pembebanan Nafkah Anak
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Divorce may only be effected through a court judgment. Empirically, divorce petitions do not always include claims for child support payments. Judges are only permitted to adjudicate matters that are expressly requested by the parties in their claims or petitions. This raises a concern regarding the extent to which the principles of ex officio and ex aequo et bono can be implemented without contravening the principle of ultra petita (ultra vires). This study utilizes a normative juridical methodology reinforced by empirical juridical research. The case approach and the statutory approach are the approaches applied. The study utilizes both primary and secondary data, and a descriptive qualitative method is used for analysis. Judicial decisions imposing child support obligations remain dependent upon the existence of claims submitted in divorce petitions. However, the codification of legal norms concerning child support obligations in statutory regulations, as well as the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 4 of 2016, gives judges legal basis to impose child support obligations without concern that such decisions would violate the principle of ultra petita (ultra vires).
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Abdullah, S. (2024). Judicial Activism (2nd ed.). Deepublish.
Al Aqsha, G., & Hafizh, A. (2024). Kewenangan Ex Officio Hakim Terhadap Pertambahan Nilai Nafkah Anak Pada Perkara Perceraian. In Jurnal Hukum Keluarga | (Vol. 9, Number 1).
Aman. (2026, January 15). Pemberian Hak Tanpa Tuntutan dalam Putusan Cerai Talak: Antara Ultra Petita dan Hak Ex Officio Hakim. Https://Marinews.Mahkamahagung.Go.Id/Artikel/Pemberian-Hak-Tanpa-Tuntutan-Dalam-Putusan-Cerai-Talak-0LF.
Boediarto, A. (2005). Kompilasi Kaidah Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Agung Hukum Acara Perdata Masa Setengah Abad. Swara Justitia.
Diar, A., Jufri, B. A., & Widodo, R. S. (2025). Tinjauan Filosofis Asas Ultra Petita Dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar . Journal Of Constituion Law, 2(5), 33–54.
Harahap, Y. (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan (Tarmizi, Ed.; 2nd ed.). Sinar Grafika.
Hardyansah, R., & Asis, L. F. (2024). Penerapan Asas Ultra Petitum Partium Di Pengadilan Agama Perspektif Hukum Islam. TARUNALAW: Journal of Law and Syariah, 2(2), 197–205.
Kaban, G. G. S. (2025, August 1). Mengabulkan yang Tidak Diminta dalam Petitum, Apakah Ultra Petita? Https://Dandapala.Com/Article/Detail/Mengabulkan-Yang-Tidak-Diminta-Dalam-Petitum-Apakah-Ultra-Petita.
Mulatua, A. (2025, September 15). Ex Aquo Et Bono, Bagaimana Hakim Menyikapinya? Https://Dandapala.Com/Opini/Detail/Ex-Aquo-et-Bono-Bagaimana-Hakim-Menyikapinya.
Musfa, N. H. De, & Syaufi, A. (2024). Asas Ultra Petita dalam Perspektif Keadilan . Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(2), 28706–28716.
Rachman, E. S. (2023). Analisis Pelaksanaan Nafkah Anak Dan Mantan Istri Pasca Putusan Pengadilan Agama Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif Serta Implikasinya Bagi Perkembangan Hukum Keluarga Islam Di Indonesia (Studi Kasus di Wilayah Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Bandar Lampung). Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Raden Intan Lampung.
Rahardjo, S. (2010). Penegakan Hukum Progresif (A. S. B. de Rosari, Ed.). Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Rahardjo, S. (2020). Hukum Progresif Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia (Ufran, Ed.; 1st ed.). Genta Publishing.
Samekto, F. A. (2025). Memahami Ajaran Hukum Gustav Radbruch (I. Sumarsih, Ed.). Rajawali Press.