Analisis Bibliometrik dan Co-Citation tentang Network Embeddedness dalam Studi Kewirausahaan dan Inovasi
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Dengan menggunakan pendekatan analisis bibliometrik dan co-citation, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggambarkan struktur intelektual dan perkembangan konseptual tentang keterikatan dengan jaringan dalam konteks inovasi dan kewirausahaan. Perangkat lunak Bibliometrix dan VOSviewer digunakan untuk menganalisis data yang diperoleh dari basis Scopus dan Web of Science dari tahun 2000 hingga 2025. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ikatan telah berkembang secara signifikan dari teori sosial klasik menuju pendekatan interdisipliner yang menggabungkan dimensi struktural, relasional, dan sosial. Pemetaan visual mengidentifikasi empat klaster utama ikatan, yaitu: (1) ikatan struktural dan relasional, (2) pendekatan sosial kapital dan pemerintahan, (3) jaringan usaha dan inovasi, dan (4) dimensi sosial dan tindakan. China, Amerika Serikat, dan Inggris adalah negara dengan kontribusi riset tertinggi. Organisasi di Eropa dan Asia juga meningkat dalam kolaborasi akademik global. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa keterlibatan dalam jaringan merupakan dasar penting untuk memahami interaksi sosial di era digital, kolaborasi inovatif, dan pengembangan kewirausahaan.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Agustina, I., Khuan, H., Aditi, B., Sitorus, S. A., & T. P. Nugrahanti. (2023). Renewable energy mix enhancement: the power of foreign investment and green policies. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13(6), 370–380.
Aria, M., & C. Cuccurullo. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
Ashari, H., & Nugrahanti, T. P. (2021). Household economy challenges in fulfilling life needs during the Covid-19 pandemic. Global Business and Economics Review, 25(1), 21–39.
Ashari, H., Nugrahanti, T. P., & B. J. Santoso. (2024). The role of microfinance institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Global Business and Economics Review, 30(2), 210–233.
Bandura, A. (2001a). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.
Bandura, A. (2001b). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.
Chen, C., Ibekwe‐SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple‐perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386–1409.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & W. M. Lim. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
Eck, N. J. Van, & L. Waltman. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070.
Garcia-Lillo, F., Seva-Larrosa, P., & Sanchez-Garcia, E. (2023). What is going on in entrepreneurship research? A bibliometric and SNA analysis. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113624.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
Gulati, R. (1998a). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293–317.
Gulati, R. (1998b). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293–317.
Gulati, R. (1999a). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397–420.
Gulati, R. (1999b). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397–420.
Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2002). Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy, 9(3), 436–464.
Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2001a). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health, 78(3), 458–467.
Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2001b). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health, 78(3), 458–467.
McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1133–1156.
Nugrahanti, T. P., Lysandra, S., & H. Ashari. (2024). Auditor Work Environment and Professional Judgment in Audit: Evidence from Indonesia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 18(4).
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003a). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–267.
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003b). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–267.
Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. (2000). Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 369–386.
Santos-Souza, H. R. dos, Azevedo-Ferreira, M., & Xavier, O. (2024). Embeddedness in complex networks: Theoretical central debate, policy implications, and research agenda in ethnic entrepreneurship. REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal, 13(03), e2485.
Trabskaia, I., Gorgadze, A., Raudsaar, M., & Myyryläinen, H. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Administrative Sciences, 13(3), 75.
Uzzi, B. (1996a). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 674–698.
Uzzi, B. (1996b). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698.
Uzzi, B. (2018a). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. In The sociology of economic life (pp. 213–241). Routledge.
Uzzi, B. (2018b). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. In The sociology of economic life (pp. 213–241). Routledge.
Vaccario, G., Verginer, L., Garas, A., Tomasello, M. V, & Schweitzer, F. (2022). Network embeddedness indicates the innovation potential of firms. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2205.07677.
Zhou, J., Cen, W., & Ling, Y. (2025). Makerspace network embeddedness, business model innovation, and user entrepreneurial performance in China: The moderating effect of environmental dynamics. PLoS One, 20(4), e0322388.
Zupic, I., & T. Čater. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.