Symbolic Power in Interlevel Interactive Learning Culture at the English Institute
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The exercise of power can occur in a communicative culture in education, for example in an interlevel communicative culture in an English department. Bourdieu's theory of symbolic power should be followed normally and unconditionally and will have a positive impact on the social groups under the power's control. The focus of this study was to use Pierre Bourdieu's concept of symbolic power to identify aspects of symbolic power through practices of habitus, capital, arena, and differentiation in cross-level dialogic learning cultures. This study was a qualitative study using a phenomenological approach. The locus of the study was the Department of English at LPBA Nurul Jadid. An interview with alumni was used to collect the data. Based on observations, cultural capital used as a guide by upper social groups could create a habitus in the elementary level. This habit was established from the time elementary level entered the institute. They were given guidelines to follow. They were also given the paradigm of being different from their seniors in terms of knowledge, education, age, and length of study. This study found a link between Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, arena, capital, and distinction and the process of adapting English learners to English proficiency promoted in the institute.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Anom, E. (2016). Pemerintah, Media dan Masyarakat di Indonesia. CV. Andi Offset.
Firmanzah, F. (2010). Persaingan, Legitimasi, Kekuasaan, dan Marketing Politik: Pembelajaran Politik Pemilu 2009. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Fiske, S. T., Dupree, C. H., Nicolas, G., & Swencionis, J. K. (2016). Status, Power, and Intergroup Relations: The Personal Is the Societal. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 44–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.012
Guillen, D. E. F. (2019). Qualitative Research: Hermeneutical Phenomenological Method. Propósitos y Representaciones, 7(1), 201–229. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n1.267
Hardiman, F. B. (2010). Ruang Publik. Kanisius.
Haryatmoko, H. (2010). Dominasi Penuh Muslihat: Akar Kekerasan dan Diskriminasi. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Haryatmoko, H. (2016). Membongkar Rezim Kepastian: Pemikiran Kritis Post-Strukturalis. PT. Kanisius.
Listiani, W., Ahimsa-Putra, H. S., Simatupang, G. L. L., & Piliang, Y. A. (2013). Struktur Modal Pierre Bourdieu pada Perilaku Kreatif Grafis Fashion Bandung. ATRAT: Jurnal Seni Rupa, 1(1), 76–89. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26742/atrat.v1i1.404
Maretha, A. T. (2018). The Deminance of Power over the Figure of Donald Trump in the Official Presidential Speech of the United States of America (The United States Recognizes Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel): A Discourse Analysis. Communicare: Journal of Communication Studies, 5(2), 1–14.
Mukarom, M. (2020). Symbolic Violence Against Private School: A Case Study of New Students Enrolment System (PPDB) in Malang City. Proceedings of the International Conference on Community Development, 47–480.
Munti, R. B. (2005). Demokrasi Keintiman: Seksualitas di Era Global. LKiS.
Muri’ah, S., & Gianto, G. (2020). The Symbolic Violence in Madrasah. Borneo International Journal of Islamic Studies, 3(1), 83–96.
Nainggolan, P. P. (2016). Peran Kapital dan Gagalnya Konsolidasi Demokratis Indonesia: Pendekatan Ekonomi-Politik. Politica, 7(1), 1–24.
Piroddi, C. (2022). Fields of Recognition: A Dialogue Between Pierre Bourdieu and Axel Honneth. Human Studies, 45, 311–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-022-09630-w
Prastia, H. T., & Suprijono, A. (2017). Praktek Kekerasan Simbolik pada Anak Autis di Salah Satu SLB di Kawasan Surabaya. Paradigma, 05(01), 1–10.
Safitri, C., Firdaus, R., & Setijowati, A. (2023). Representation of Symbolic Violence and Social Inequality in High Society Film. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 10(9), 121–132. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i9.5027
Simanjuntak, B. A. (2001). Konflik Status dan Kekuasaan Orang Batak Toba: Bagian Sejarah Batak. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Sjaf, S. (2014). Politik Etnik Dinamika Politik Lokal di Kendari. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Sukidin, S., & Suharso, P. (2015). Pemikiran Sosiologi Kontemporer. UPT Penerbitan UNEJ.
Vakalopoulos, K. (2022). Shedding Some (More) Light in Bourdieu’s Habitus and Doxa: A Socio-Phenomenological Approach. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 53(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12364
Vigerland, L., & Borg, E. A. (2017). Cultural Capital in the Economic Field: A Study of Relationships in an Art Market. Philosophy of Management, 17, 169–185.
Wirawan, G. (2016). Analisis Struktural Antologi Puisi Hujan Lolos di Sela Jari Karya Yudhiswara. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 39–44.