Spatial Learning Technologies for Inclusive Anatomy Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Neurodiversity
Main Article Content
Abstract
Anatomy education requires advanced spatial reasoning and increasingly incorporates technologies such as virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), Anatomage, and 3D printing. Differences in visuospatial processing and executive functioning among learners with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) make the relevance of spatial technologies to inclusive education an important area of investigation. Objective. This study synthesizes evidence on the effectiveness of digital spatial anatomy learning modalities and their implications for neurodivergent learners, particularly those with ADHD. Methods. A systematic literature review following PRISMA 2020 was conducted on publications from 2021 to 2026. Studies were identified across multiple databases, selected using the PICOS framework, appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and AMSTAR-2, and synthesized narratively and thematically. Results. Twenty-six studies were grouped into five thematic clusters. Digital 3D modalities were generally comparable or superior to conventional methods in improving factual and spatial knowledge, with effectiveness influenced by learners' initial visuospatial ability. ADHD literature indicates differences in visuospatial processing, while AR and VR may reduce cognitive load and enhance engagement. However, no studies directly examined spatial anatomy technologies among medical students with ADHD. Conclusion. A significant evidence gap exists at the intersection of neurodiversity and spatial anatomy learning, highlighting the need for empirical research to support more inclusive anatomy education.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Adnan, S., Benson, A. C., & Xiao, J. (2025). How virtual reality is being adopted in anatomy education in health sciences and allied health: A systematic review. Anatomical Sciences Education, 18(5), 496–525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70027
Ahmed, M. A. A. S. (2023). Use of the Anatomage virtual table in medical education and as a diagnostic tool: an integrative review. Cureus, 15(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35981
Asad, M. R., Asghar, A., Tadvi, N., Ahmed, M. M., Nazeer, M., Amir, K. M., Nasir, N., Shaik, R. A., Patra, A., & Asad, M. R. (2023). Medical faculty perspectives toward cadaveric dissection as a learning tool for anatomy education: a survey study in India. Cureus, 15(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37713
Asghar, A., Naaz, S., Patra, A., Ravi, K. S., & Khanal, L. (2022). Effectiveness of 3D-printed models prepared from radiological data for anatomy education: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of 22 randomized, controlled, crossover trials. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 11, 353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_199_22
Aspanani, A., Sadeqhi, H., & Omid, A. (2023). The relationship between visual memory and spatial intelligence with students’ academic achievement in anatomy. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 336. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04327-9
Bailey, A., Grotowski, M., & Bailey, S. (2023). Medical education: Accommodating students with ADHD. Medical Teacher, 46, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2023.2287984
Bogomolova, K., Vorstenbosch, M. A. T. M., El Messaoudi, I., Holla, M., Hovius, S. E. R., van der Hage, J. A., & Hierck, B. P. (2023). Effect of binocular disparity on learning anatomy with stereoscopic augmented reality visualization: A double center randomized controlled trial. Anatomical Sciences Education, 16(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2164
Bölek, K. A., De Jong, G., & Henssen, D. (2021). The effectiveness of the use of augmented reality in anatomy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 15292. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94721-4
Chytas, D., Salmas, M., Demesticha, T., & Troupis, T. G. (2022). Can virtual environments be detrimental for anatomy education of students with low spatial ability? The important role of assessment methods. Anatomical Sciences Education, 15(6), 1152–1154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2185
Eirini-Maria, K., Ioanna, K., Stavros, A., & Dimitrios, F. (2023). The anatomage table: A promising alternative in anatomy education. Cureus, 15(8). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43047
García‐Robles, P., Cortés‐Pérez, I., Nieto‐Escámez, F. A., García‐López, H., Obrero‐Gaitán, E., & Osuna‐Pérez, M. C. (2024). Immersive virtual reality and augmented reality in anatomy education: a systematic review and Meta‐Analysis. Anatomical Sciences Education, 17(3), 514–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2397
Lee, N. Y. W., & Zhang, M. W. Bin. (2025). Systematic review on prevalence of ADHD, possible ADHD or ADHD symptoms in medical students. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16, 1684727. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1684727
Minouei, M. A., Omid, A., Mirzaie, A., Mahdavifard, H., & Rahimi, A. (2024). Effectiveness of virtual reality on medical students’ academic achievement in anatomy: systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1407. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06402-1
Nejati, V., Khoshroo, S., & Mirikaram, F. (2024). Review of spatial disability in individuals with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: Toward spatial cognition theory. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 29(1), 312–337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045231176707
Nokovitch, L., El Hajj, H., Deneuve, S., De Andrade, V., Gagnayre, R., & Margat, A. (2025). Visual–spatial abilities enhancement and spatial anatomy learning: A systematic review. Medical Education, 59(12), 1322–1332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.70022
Odogwu, T. S., Mohamed, E. A. H., Mishu, L., & Umahi, I. (2025). Effect of virtual reality simulation on anatomy learning outcomes: a systematic review. Cureus, 17(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.81893
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., & Brennan, S. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj, 372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Parmar, R., Oyelere, S. S., & Aruleba, K. (2026). A user-centred approach to enhancing engagement and task management for ADHD students using AR and generative AI. Discover Education, 5(1), 235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01264-9
Roach, V. A., Mi, M., Mussell, J., Van Nuland, S. E., Lufler, R. S., DeVeau, K. M., Dunham, S. M., Husmann, P., Herriott, H. L., & Edwards, D. N. (2021). Correlating spatial ability with anatomy assessment performance: A meta‐analysis. Anatomical Sciences Education, 14(3), 317–329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2029
Sagoo, M. G., Lam, P. Y., Theivendran, S., & Wingate, R. (2025). Exploring the potential malleability of spatial skills through anatomy teaching: A quantitative study among medical students. Anatomical Sciences Education, 18(9), 961–971. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70071
Salimi, S., Asgari, Z., Mohammadnejad, A., Teimazi, A., & Bakhtiari, M. (2024). Efficacy of virtual reality and augmented reality in anatomy education: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Anatomical Sciences Education, 17(9), 1668–1685. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2501
Sarilita, E., Lita, Y. A., Firman, D. R., Wilkinson, T., Susilawati, S., Saptarini, R., Aripin, D., & Sjamsudin, E. (2022). Spatial ability and anatomy learning performance among dental students. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 34(4), 309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2022.239
Șișu, A. M., Stoicescu, E. R., Bolintineanu, S. L., Faur, A. C., Iacob, R., Ghenciu, D. M., Dănilă, A.-I., & Hațegan, O. A. (2024). Blending tradition and innovation: student opinions on modern anatomy education. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111150
Wolfers, J., Hurst, W., & Krampe, C. (2026). Integrating EEG Sensors with Virtual Reality to Support Students with ADHD. Sensors, 26(3), 1017. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/s26031017
Xie, G., Wang, T., Fu, H., Liu, D., Deng, L., Zheng, X., Li, L., & Liao, J. (2025). The role of three-dimensional printing models in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 826. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07187-7
Yang, R., Sun, W., Liu, X., & Cao, Y. (2025). Enhancing attention and emotion regulation in children with ADHD through AR digital picture books: a structural equation modeling approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1613728. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1613728
Ye, Z., Jiang, H., Bai, S., Wang, T., Yang, D., Hou, H., Zhang, Y., & Yi, S. (2023). Meta-analyzing the efficacy of 3D printed models in anatomy education. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 11, 1117555. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1117555